---
Three years ago, I made the rookie mistake that probably half of all character artists make when they're starting out.
I modeled a male character base mesh, decided I needed a female version, and just... scaled the hips wider and the shoulders narrower. Added some chest geometry. Called it a day.
Then I tried to animate both characters in the same scene, and immediately realized why my female character looked like a guy in a wig.
The problem wasn't what I changed. It was everything I didn't change.
It's Not About Proportions Alone
Here's what they don't tell you in the basic tutorials: male and female anatomy differ in ways that go far beyond measurements.
Yes, women typically have wider hips relative to their shoulders. Yes, men usually have broader upper bodies. Everyone knows this.
But the skeletal structure is different. The muscle distribution is different. The way weight sits on the frame is different. Even the way the ribcage angles is different.
I learned this the hard way when a more experienced animator pointed out that my female character's shoulders were moving like a linebacker's. Same rig, same animation, but it looked completely wrong because the underlying structure wasn't built with female biomechanics in mind.
The Pelvis Is Everything
If I could go back and tell my younger self one thing about gendered base meshes, it would be this: get the pelvis right, and half your problems disappear.
The female pelvis isn't just wider. It's tilted differently. It's shallower front to back. The whole structure affects how the legs connect, how the spine curves, and how the entire lower body moves.
When I finally studied actual anatomy references instead of just eyeballing it, I realized my female characters had been walking like men because their pelvic structure was wrong. No amount of animation finesse could fix a structural problem at the modeling level.
The male pelvis is narrower and deeper. It sits higher. The legs come off at a different angle. These aren't subtle differences. They're fundamental to how the body is built and how it moves.
Shoulders Tell a Story
Men and women carry their shoulders differently, and it's not just about width.
Male shoulders tend to be squared off. The trapezius muscles are usually more defined. The clavicles sit differently. There's more mass in the upper chest and shoulders.
Female shoulders slope more. They're rounder. The trapezius is less pronounced. Even in athletic women, the shoulder structure tends to be more curved than angular.
I used to think this was just about muscle definition. Then I started working on a project that required historical accuracy, and I had to research period anatomy studies. Turns out, the bone structure itself is different, and muscles can only do so much.
Now when I build a female base mesh, I start with rounder, sloping shoulders. When I build a male base mesh, I start with more angular, squared forms. The difference in the final animation is night and day.
The Ribcage Angle Nobody Mentions
This one blew my mind when I finally figured it out.
The female ribcage tends to angle upward slightly. It's a subtle tilt, but it affects the entire torso's silhouette.
The male ribcage is more cylindrical and sits more vertically.
This tiny difference changes how clothing drapes, how the waist appears, and how the entire upper body moves during animation. I'd been fighting with cloth simulations for weeks before I realized the underlying mesh structure was wrong.
Where the Waist Actually Is
I see this mistake constantly: modelers put the waist at the narrowest point of the torso.
But anatomically, the waist isn't defined by width. It's defined by the location of the floating ribs and the top of the pelvis.
On a female figure, the narrowest point and the anatomical waist are often close to the same place. On a male figure, they can be quite different. Men often have their narrowest torso point higher up, near the lower ribs, while the actual waist (the bending point) is lower.
Getting this wrong means your character won't bend naturally at the waist. I spent an entire weekend fixing a male character's torso because I'd placed the edge loops based on silhouette rather than anatomy.
Arm Positioning and the Carrying Angle
Here's something I wish someone had explained to me years ago: women's arms naturally hang at a different angle than men's.
It's called the carrying angle, and it exists because of how the elbow joint is structured relative to the shoulder. Women typically have a greater carrying angle, which means the forearm angles out more from the elbow.
In a neutral T-pose or A-pose, male arms tend to hang closer to vertical. Female arms angle out slightly more.
This seems like a tiny detail until you're posing a character in a natural standing position, and somehow it looks wrong, and you can't figure out why. It's usually because the arms are positioned with the wrong carrying angle.
The Neck Is Not Just a Cylinder
Male necks tend to be more vertical and substantial. More mass, more definition in the sternocleidomastoid muscles.
Female necks are usually more slender and often have a slight forward angle.
This affects everything from how the head sits on the shoulders to how scarves and necklaces drape. It's another one of those details that seems minor but creates a cumulative effect.
I used to just make female necks thinner and call it done. Now I actually angle them differently and adjust where they meet the shoulders. The difference in the final render is subtle but crucial.
Hands and Feet Matter More Than You Think
I'll admit, I used to use the same hand and foot base meshes for both male and female characters. Just scaled them down for women.
Big mistake.
Female hands aren't just smaller male hands. The proportions are different. The fingers tend to taper more. The knuckles are less pronounced. The palm shape is different.
Same with feet. The arch tends to be higher in female feet. The heel shape is different. The toe proportions vary.
Are these going to be visible in every shot? No. But they contribute to the overall believability of the character. And when you're doing closeups of hands or feet, these details absolutely matter.
When to Make Two Base Meshes
Here's a question I get asked constantly: should you make separate base meshes for male and female characters, or modify one from the other?
My honest answer: it depends on what you're doing.
For background characters or NPCs where you need variety and consistency, I actually start with a neutral base mesh and modify it. The workflow is faster, and the slight anatomical compromises don't matter at that distance.
For hero characters, protagonists, or anyone who's going to be in closeup shots and complex animations, I build gender-specific base meshes from scratch. The extra time investment is worth it for the quality difference.
The Animation Test
Want to know if your gendered base meshes are actually different enough?
Give them the same idle animation. Not a walk cycle, not an action sequence. Just a simple idle animation where the character is standing and breathing.
If they move identically, your base meshes aren't differentiated enough.
A woman's idle animation typically has more movement in the hips and chest. A man's idle typically has more shoulder and upper chest movement. If your base meshes are built right, these animations should look natural on each without requiring completely different rigging.
The Spectrum Reality
Here's the thing nobody wants to complicate the tutorials with: human bodies exist on a spectrum.
Not all women have wide hips and narrow shoulders. Not all men have broad shoulders and narrow hips. There are muscular women and slender men and everything in between.
So why do we make "male" and "female" base meshes with these generalized characteristics?
Because we're not trying to represent every possible body type with one mesh. We're creating foundational templates that represent common characteristics we can modify.
Think of them as starting points, not final destinations.
I've used my "female" base mesh for athletic male characters by adjusting proportions. I've used my "male" base mesh for larger female characters the same way. The key is understanding what you're starting with and how to modify it intelligently.
What Changes, What Doesn't
Through years of building different characters, I've learned which parts need gender-specific modeling and which can be more universal:
**Must be different:**
- Pelvis structure
- Shoulder width and angle
- Ribcage shape and angle
- Overall proportions
**Can often be universal:**
- Finger topology
- Ear structure
- Nose topology (though size and shape vary)
- Basic facial edge loops
This knowledge saves massive amounts of time. I don't need to rebuild every part of the anatomy from scratch. I focus my gender-specific modeling on the areas that actually matter.
The Professional Perspective
In professional animation, especially for games and film, character modelers often specialize.
Some studios have artists who only do male characters. Others only do female characters. Not because they can't do both, but because achieving the subtle anatomical accuracy required for production work demands deep familiarity.
I've done both, and I'll tell you: every time I switch from primarily modeling one gender to the other, there's a learning curve. The muscle memory of where edge loops go, how forms flow, what proportions look right—it all takes time to retrain.
The Workflow I Actually Use
When I'm starting a new project that needs both male and female characters, here's my process:
I build the male base mesh first because, honestly, I find it more forgiving. The more angular forms are easier for me to establish.
Then I build the female base mesh from scratch, not by modifying the male. I use the same topology in the face and hands for consistency, but the torso, pelvis, and legs are all fresh geometry built with female anatomy in mind.
This gives me two solid foundations that I can modify for different body types while maintaining proper gendered characteristics.
The Mistakes I Still Make
Even after years of doing this, I still catch myself defaulting to familiar patterns.
I still sometimes make female shoulders too broad because I'm used to male proportions. I still sometimes make male hips too narrow because I've been working on female characters.
The difference now is that I catch these mistakes during the modeling phase instead of discovering them during animation. Experience hasn't made me perfect. It's made me better at seeing my own errors.
Why This Actually Matters
You might be thinking, "Does all this really matter if my characters look good?"
For illustration or still renders, maybe you can get away with approximations. But for animation, these details compound.
A female character with male shoulder structure won't move right in a dress. A male character with female hip structure won't run naturally. The rigging can compensate somewhat, but it's fighting against the geometry.
Good animators can make mediocre models move beautifully. But why force them to fight your base mesh when you could give them something that's built to move correctly from the start?
Moving Forward
Understanding gendered anatomy in base meshes isn't about enforcing stereotypes or being restrictive. It's about understanding the biomechanical reality of how different body structures move.
The goal is to create base meshes that serve as strong foundations—templates you can modify and customize while maintaining structural integrity.
Start with the skeleton. Understand how the bones actually fit together differently. Then build the forms around that structure.
Your characters will move better, pose more naturally, and require less fighting during animation.
And you won't make the mistake I made, trying to fix movement problems that were really modeling problems all along.
---